Daily Michael
  • Home
  • News
    • Estate Statements
  • Lawsuits
    • Robson-Safechuck-Doe
    • Estate v. IRS
    • Cascio Lawsuit
    • Q.Jones v. Estate
    • Estate v. Tohme
    • 3T v. Radar Online
    • Last Photo Shoots
    • King of Pop Lawsuit
    • MJ Company Lawsuit
  • Past Lawsuits
    • People v. Murray
    • Jackson v. AEG
    • Estate v. HTWF
    • Bain v. Estate
    • Lloyds v. Estate
    • Estate v. Mann
    • Hologram Lawsuit
    • Chicago Lawsuit
    • Other
  • The Estate
  • Reviews
  • Opinions

Robson family is selling autographed Michael Jackson memorabilia

Details
Admin
Robson v. Estate
30 August 2015
Hits: 11575
fShare
Tweet

On August 29 2015 , on the date that would have marked Michael Jackson's 57th birthday, fans realized a MJ autographed item was listed on eBay recently. Item description stated this picture was hanging on the wall of MJ's recording studio. MJ took it off the wall and signed the back of it. Item was listed as still in good condition. 

chantal2

Seller's account name was Chantal818 and item was located at Playa del Rey, California. The asking price was $1,100. It looked like every other item listed for sale on eBay. That's until you look to the 5th picture. The inscription of the picture read " To WADE the Best friend in the universe Love Michael Jackson".

Read more ...

Safechuck Civil Complaint

Details
ivy
Robson v. Estate
04 August 2015
Hits: 7646
fShare
Tweet

 Although Safechuck filed a civil case in 2014, his civil case remained silent and inactive until June 2015. On July, 2015 Safechuck identified Doe2 and Doe 3 defendants. This will start the process (demurrer and such) for Safechuck civil case. Why now? In my personal opinion, judge dismissing Robson’s probate claim demonstrated that Safechuck’s probate claim doesn’t stand much chance either therefore they are focusing their efforts on the civil claims.

Safechuck’s civil complaint provides information about why his probate claim most probably wouldn’t be successful. Probate code requires any claim to be filed within 60 days of knowledge of administration of the Estate and the creditor’s actual knowledge of the existence of the facts giving rise to the existence of the claim. Unlike Robson, Safechuck doesn’t claim he didn’t know about the Estate. To the contrary, Safechuck openly admits he heard from news reports that John Branca would be managing MJ’s business affairs and he knew who Branca was. Safechuck similar to Robson doesn’t claim repressed memory. He states he told his mother in 2005 MJ was a “bad man” and he told his mother in “briefest statement that he had been abused” in 2005. Furthermore Safechuck started to see a therapist on May 20, 2013. Given Safechuck hasn’t filed his probate claim until 2014, there’s no way he can satisfy the within 60 days rule of probate. That alone should be enough for the judge to dismiss his probate claim eventually. ( Few rounds of chances to amend a complaint routinely happens).

That brings us to the civil complaint.

Read more ...

MJ related lawsuit updates – July 2015

Details
ivy
News
29 July 2015
Hits: 7421
fShare
Tweet

This is a list about MJ related lawsuits. I added short summary of case description and latest developments in each case for ease of following.  I will be updating this list every few months.

Previous updates

May 2015 Update : http://dailymichael.com/news/299-mj-related-lawsuit-updates-may-2015

January 2015 Update: http://dailymichael.com/news/290-mj-related-lawsuit-updates-january-2015

November 2014 Update : http://dailymichael.com/news/286-mj-related-lawsuit-updates-november-2014

MJ Estate v. IRS (Link)

Description:This lawsuit is about the estate tax dispute. IRS is demanding $731 Million in estate tax. MJ Estate challenged IRS by filing a lawsuit.

Latest developments:  Parties are still in settlement talks. On April 27, 2015 a second stipulation of settled issues were filed with the court - signaling parties continue to settle disputed issues. Parties filed a status report at the end of June. US Tax Court writes parties are reporting "good progress" in settling valuation disputes. Next status report is due November 2015.

 Noval Williams Films v. MJ Estate (Link)

Description: This is a dispute about “Last Photo Shoot” documentary. The documentary uses footage from two photo shoots from 2007. It also includes some photos. Estate believes some content are owned by MJ and MJ didn’t give consent for release of the footage. Noval Williams is seeking a declaratory relief that they aren’t infringing copyrights. Case has been filed in New York and Estate has filed a motion to dismiss the case or in alternative move it to California. Estate also filed a motion to disqualify Noval Williams Films attorney Markovich who also happens to be a producer of the movie as well as an owner and manager at Noval Williams Films.

Latest developments: No new developments since last update. Parties are still waiting for the court's ruling about location issue and Noval Williams Films attorney. In July 2015, lawyer for Noval Williams has sent the court a letter reminding the judge that parties have been waiting for a decision since December 2014.

Read more ...

MJ Estate v. Tohme - Labor Commissioner Decision

Details
ivy
Estate v. Tohme
22 July 2015
Hits: 8489
fShare
Tweet

Background

Tohme filed a complaint against MJ Estate asking for fees he’s owed. These were 10% from Neverland refinancing, 10% from any future transaction about Neverland, $35,000 per month plus 15% of income from services he provided (plus interest when applicable). Estate petitioned Labor Commissioner based on California’s Talent Agency Act to cancel three agreements MJ had with Tohme. The three agreements are Neverland finder’s fee agreement, services agreement (management agreement) and indemnity agreement. Labor Commissioner heard this petition on late 2013 and took it under submission. Late 2014 Tohme requested to put Neverland finder’s fee agreement issue on calendar and judge lifted the stay for that issue on January 2015. Parties have filed their initial motions about the Neverland Finder’s Fee. A tentative trial date for Neverland Finder’s fee is set for May 2016.

Labor Commissioner Determination

Document here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/272285682/Tohme-Labor-Commisioner-Determination

After 20 months of waiting, Labor Commissioner has finally finalized their decision for Estate’s petition to cancel MJ - Tohme agreements based on CA Talent Agency Act.

Labor Commissioner determines that Tohme was not licensed to work as a talent agency during the period he worked for Michael. Labor Commissioner focuses on the TII concert deal.

Read more ...

More Articles ...

  1. July 20, 2015 - Robson and Safechuck demurrer hearing
  2. MJ Estate Fourth Accounting - Document & Summary
  3. Robson Civil Case: Demurrer for the Third Amended Civil Complaint
  4. Judge’s ruling dismissing Robson’s late probate claim against MJ Estate
  5. MJ related lawsuit updates – May 2015
Page 12 of 23
  • Start
  • Prev
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • Next
  • End

Latest Articles

  • Robson case dismissed for good, Judge’s ruling explained
  • Summary Judgment Time at Robson Case
  • Wade Robson's Lawyers Harass Jonathan Spence
  • Specifics of the verdict at Quincy Jones v. MJ Estate trial
  • Joy Robson and Others Expose Wade’s Lies - The Summary Judgment Exhibits

Welcome

Welcome to Daily Michael - a fan site dedicated to Michael Jackson. Don't forget to follow us at twitter and facebook.

 

Ivy Twitter

Daily Michael Twitter

Daily Michael Facebook

About us: Daily Michael is a Michael Jackson fan site. It is established in 2014. 

Contact us : admin@dailymichael.com

Copyright ©2010-2016 Daily Michael

Bootstrap is a front-end framework of Twitter, Inc. Code licensed under MIT License. Font Awesome font licensed under SIL OFL 1.1.